A SAFE NAVIGATION PROPOSAL FOR KANAL ISTANBUL: INTEGRATED TUG-BARGE SYSTEM

Authors

  • İrşad BAYIRHAN İstanbul Üniversitesi, Deniz Bilimleri ve İşletmeciliği Enstitüsü

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46291/ICONTECHvol4iss3pp50-64

Keywords:

Canal Istanbul, ITBS, Barge, Tug

Abstract

"Canal Istanbul", officially announced in 2011; is an alternative waterway project to the Strait of Istanbul, designed to relieve ship traffic. The main intention of relieving the ship traffic is to transfer the tanker traffic, which poses a significant risk to the Istanbul metropolis, to Canal Istanbul. On the basis of the criticisms made to the project in line with the determined dimensions, another risk factor, the issue of safe navigation opportunities and the economic criterion of the lower tonnage transportation that arises in this sense come to the fore.

In fact, in all artificial canals in the world, before the project is created compared to natural water passages (channels), similar concerns are experienced among the parties of maritime transport and the necessary projection studies are carried out. Likewise, such studies have been carried out for Canal Istanbul and the simulations have been verified in terms of navigation. The main issue that causes concern here is the question of to what extent a ship with the dimensions based on simulations will be commercially and technically effective compared to the existing fleet. However, the optimum usage of such a water passage can be solved by a set of transportation engineering strategies and a system that puts the competitive and environmentalist side of canal use in the foreground.

In this study, the integrated tugboat-barge system (ITBS) is thought to be the most ideal transportation system for Canal Istanbul, whose has not been completed yet. The contribution of the ITBS system, which is widely used in world canal and water transport, to the optimum use of existing waterways and its being environmentally friendly, has been the main motivation for this study. A detailed literature study has been made on the subject, the examples of this form of transportation in the world have been examined and the form usable for Canal Istanbul has been specified. In addition, the criticisms made about Canal Istanbul formed the set of problems in the study, and reasonable solutions were offered to these problems with the usefulness of the proposed transportation system, and the advantages of the system were explained.

References

Ağıralioğlu, N., Şaşal, M., Işık, S., ve Saltabaş, L. (2001). Aşağı Sakarya Nehrinde İç Su Yolu Taşımacılığı Potansiyeli. Türkiye İnşaat Mühendisliği XVI. Teknik Kongre ve Sergisi Sempozyumu, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümü ve TMMOB İnşaat Mühendisleri Odası. Ankara. 1-3 Kasım 2001.

Bayırhan, İ., Mersin, K., Tokuşlu, A., & Gazioğlu, C. (2019). Modelling of Ship Originated Exhaust Gas Emissions in the Strait of Istanbul (Bosphorus). International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 6(3), 238-243.

Bayırhan, İ., Nas, S . (2018). Güzelhisar Deresi’nin Aliağa Organize Sanayi Bölgesi İçin Suyolu Olarak Tasarımı. Teknik Dergi, 29 (1) , 8199-8224.

Baykal, R. (2011). Gemiler ve Açık Deniz Yapıları. İstanbul: Birsen Yayınevi.

Damen (2020). A Vessel for Every Purpose. https://www.damen.com/en, (06.09.2020).

ECMT. (12 Haziran 1992). Resolution No. 92/2 On New Classifıcation Of Inland Waterways. http://www.internationaltransportforum.org/IntOrg/ecmt/waterways /pdf/wat922e.pdf , (06.09.2020).

Hilferink, P. (1999). Netherlands. ECMT Economic Research Centre - Report of the Hundred and Eighth Round Table On Transport Economics: What Markets are There for Transport by Inland Waterways? (ss.175-213). Paris: OECD Publications Service.

Kanal İstanbul Resmi İnternet Sitesi (2020), https://www.kanalistanbul.gov.tr/tr, (20.05.2020).

Kasserman, D. D. (2013). Use of Mississippi and Missouri Rivers in Commerce. New York: Salem Press Encyclopedia.

Mersin, K., Bayirhan, İ., & Gazioğlu, C. (2019). Review of CO2 Emission and Reducing Methods in Maritime Transportation. Thermal Science, (00), 372-372.

Müller, E. (2003). Innovative Transport Vehicles: Rhine. Competitive and Sustainable Growth Programme. European Strategies to Promote Inland Navigation Working Papers. 3(1): 2-51.

PIANC. (1990). Standardization of Ships and Inland Waterways Dimensions. Brüksel: General Secretariat of PIANC.

PIANC. (1991). Analysis of Cost of Operating Vessels on Inland Waterways. Brüksel: General Secretariat of PIANC.

PIANC. (1992). Container Transport with Inland Vessels. Brüksel: General Secretariat of PIANC.

PIANC. (2005). Economic Aspects of Inland Waterways. Brüksel: General Secretariat of PIANC.

Rijkswaterstaat. (2011a). Waterway Guidelines 2011. Delft: RWS Centre for Transport and Navigation.

Rijkswaterstaat. (2011b). A Brief History of Inland Navigation and Waterways the Development of the Waterway Infrastructure in the Netherlands. Delft: RWS Centre for Transport and Navigation.

Rivers of the World Project. (10 Aralık 2010). Rivers of the World Atlas: Atlas on Inland Waterways Transport. http://www.riversoftheworld.nl/atlas , (15.2.2020).

Taşdemir, A. ve Nohut, S. (2013). İç Suların Deniz Taşımacılığında Kullanılmasının Tarihi Geçmişi ve Önemi: Fırat Örneği. Gemi ve Deniz Teknolojisi. (195): 42-47.

Turnbull, G. (1987). Canals, Coal and Regional Growth During the Industrial Revolution. Economic History Review. 40(4): 537-560.

Published

2020-12-18

How to Cite

BAYIRHAN, İrşad. (2020). A SAFE NAVIGATION PROPOSAL FOR KANAL ISTANBUL: INTEGRATED TUG-BARGE SYSTEM. ICONTECH INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 4(3), 50-64. https://doi.org/10.46291/ICONTECHvol4iss3pp50-64

Issue

Section

Articles