Evaluation of Treatment and Reuse Potential of Textile Wastewaters: A Case Study from Denim Production

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19024199

Keywords:

Water reuse, Conductivity, Membrane treatment, Textile wastewater

Abstract

The textile sector is highly water-intensive and generates wastewater with complex and variable chemical characteristics. In denim production, dyeing and stone-washing processes contribute to elevated organic load, suspended solids, color, and salinity. This study evaluates the performance of conventional and advanced treatment technologies using field data from a denim facility located in the water-stressed Meriç–Ergene Basin. The treatment system consists of primary treatment, extended aeration activated sludge, ultrafiltration (UF), and reverse osmosis (RO). Influent concentrations were 336 mg/L COD, 368 mg/L total suspended solids, and 262 Pt-Co color. Biological treatment achieved approximately 87% COD removal but showed negligible conductivity reduction, indicating limited salt removal. UF effectively removed suspended solids yet provided only partial reduction of dissolved constituents. After RO treatment, COD decreased to 4 mg/L, conductivity to 10 µS/cm, and color to 4 Pt-Co, satisfying international reuse criteria. The findings indicate that compliance with discharge standards does not guarantee suitability for process water reuse and emphasize the necessity of membrane-based advanced treatment to support water circularity in textile production, particularly in water-scarce regions.

References

APHA, 2017. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, & Water Environment Federation. (2017). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (23rd ed.). American Public Health Association.

Arastou, K., Hosseinzadeh, A., Jamshidi, S., & Tafazzoli, P. (2025). Grey water and carbon footprint of textile industry: A case study. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 16, 103593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2025.103593

Atalay Eroğlu, H., & Akbal, F. (2025). Enhancing textile wastewater reuse: Integrating Fenton oxidation with membrane filtration. Journal of Environmental Management, 379, 124873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124873

Ben Amar, N., Kechaou, N., Palmeri, J., Deratani, A., & Sghaier, A. (2009). Comparison of tertiary treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for water reuse in denim textile industry. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 170(1–2), 111–117.

Bilinska, L., & Gmurek, M. (2021). Novel trends in AOPs for textile wastewater treatment: Enhanced dye by-products removal by catalytic and synergistic actions. Water Resources and Industry, 26, 100160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wri.2021.100160

EEA, 2025. European Environment Agency. Water use for the EU’s textiles consumption. https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/circularity/sectoral-modules/textiles/water-use-for-eus-textiles-consumption

Ergül, M. (2014). Investigation of textile industry wastewater treatment using laboratory and pilot scale submerged membrane bioreactors (MBR) (Master’s thesis, Istanbul Technical University).

Golob, V., Vinder, A., & Simoni, M. (2005). Efficiency of the coagulation/flocculation method for the treatment of dyebath effluents. Dyes and Pigments, 67(2), 93–97.

Jegatheesan, V., Pramanik, B. K., Chen, J., Navaratna, D., Chang, C. Y., & Shu, L. (2016). Treatment of textile wastewater with membrane bioreactor: A critical review. Bioresource Technology, 204, 202–212.

Katheresan, V., Kansedo, J., & Lau, S. Y. (2018). Efficiency of various recent wastewater dye removal methods: A review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 6(4), 4676–4697.

Kumar, P. S., Prasanth, S. M., Harish, S., & Rishikesh, M. (2021). Industrial water footprint: Case study on textile industries. In P. S. Kumar & S. K. Sahu (Eds.), Water footprint: Assessment and case studies (pp. 35–60).

Ozturk, E., Koseoglu, H., Karaboyacı, M., Yigit, N. O., Yetis, U., & Kitis, M. (2016). Minimization of water and chemical use in a cotton/polyester fabric dyeing textile mill. Journal of Cleaner Production, 130, 92–102.

Rai, H. S., Bhattacharyya, M. S., Singh, J., Bansal, T. K., Purva, V., & Banerjee, U. C. (2005). Removal of dyes from the effluent of textile and dyestuff manufacturing industry: A review of emerging techniques with reference to biological treatment. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 35, 219–238.

Ranganathan, K., Karunagaran, K., & Sharma, D. C. (2007). Recycling of wastewaters of textile dyeing industries using advanced treatment technology and cost analysis—Case studies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 50, 306–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.06.019

Ribeiro, M. C. M., Starling, M. C. V., Leão, M. M. D., & de Amorim, C. C. (2017). Textile wastewater reuse after additional treatment by Fenton’s reagent. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, 6165–6175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8170-8

Samsami, S., Mohamadi, M., Sarrafzadeh, M. H., Rene, E. R., & Firoozbahr, M. (2020). Recent advances in the treatment of dye-containing wastewater from textile industries: Overview and perspectives. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 143, 138–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.07.034

Sandin, G., & Peters, G. M. (2018). Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 353–365.

Sayam, S., Das, N., Akter, S., Saha, J., Sarker, A., Sen, A., Habibullah, H., Sajib, G. A., Haque, I., Mia, M. B., Faruk, M. O., Fatema, S., Munshi, M. K.,

Paul, P. C., & Haider, M. I. (2025). Water and electricity consumption patterns with effluent quality in the textile processing industry of Bangladesh. RSC Advances, 15, 46627.

Sharma, M., Tyagi, V. V., Chopra, K., Kothari, R., Singh, H. M., & Pandey, A. K. (2023). Advancement in solar energy-based technologies for sustainable treatment of textile wastewater: Reuse, recovery and current perspectives. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 56, 104241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104241

SKKY, 2014. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Environment and Forestry. (2004). Water pollution control regulation (Official Gazette No. 25687, December 31, 2004).

Solak, M., & Öztürk, A. (2018). Endüstriyel atıksu arıtımında kimyasal ve elektrokimyasal proseslerin etkinliğinin karşılaştırılması: Denim ürün üretim sektörü. Journal of Advanced Technology Sciences, 7(2), 20–35.

SWQR, 2012.Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Environment and Urbanization. (2012). Surface Water Quality Regulation (Official Gazette No. 28483, November 30, 2012). https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/

Torrades, F., & García-Montaño, J. (2014). Using central composite experimental design to optimize the degradation of real dye wastewater by Fenton and photo-Fenton reactions. Dyes and Pigments, 100, 184–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.08.019

World Bank. (2019). The cost of fashion and the environment. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2019/09/23/costo-moda-medio-ambiente

World Population Review. (2026). Textile exports by country. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/textile-exports-by-country

Yukseler, H., Uzal, N., Sahinkaya, E., Kitis, M., Dilek, F. B., & Yetis, U. (2017). Analysis of the best available techniques for wastewaters from a denim manufacturing textile mill. Journal of Environmental Management, 203, 1118–1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.041

Zhou, L., & Zhou, H. (2019). Evaluation of textile industry wastewater treatment and reuse in China. Desalination and Water Treatment, 144, 330–338.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-15

How to Cite

HANEDAR, B. H., URETEN, E., & GÜNEŞ, Y. (2026). Evaluation of Treatment and Reuse Potential of Textile Wastewaters: A Case Study from Denim Production. ICONTECH INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 8(5), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19024199