Investigation of Iconic Architecture-Nature Relationship

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8130857

Keywords:

Inspiration from nature in architecture, Contemporary iconic buildings, Contemporary iconic building-nature relationship, Construction Technology

Abstract

Architects have mostly seen nature as a source of inspiration in the process from the past to the present. Nature has always been a source of inspiration for architectural design in terms of form, aesthetics, and harmony. The prominent approach in today’s design approach; is not to use nature directly as a figural source of inspiration, but to evaluate nature as a production process that deals with it as a whole. Advances in technology and natural sciences and information technologies in the 20th century enabled architecture to work integrated with physics, chemistry, biology, and mathematics; The functioning of nature has begun to be used in architectural design, not only as a form but also as a structure and material. Today, iconic buildings with their different and innovative designs are often inspired by nature with the aim of being original and different. Because iconic buildings need a strong associative meaning in order to remain in the memory of the viewer, and at this point, living and non-living nature offer architects an unlimited source of inspiration for iconic design. In this study, the iconic building-nature relationship was discussed, nature-inspired iconic buildings designed at the end of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st century were selected and these buildings were classified and analyzed according to their source of inspiration from nature. A detailed literature review was conducted for the selected structures; The identity of the buildings, the architectural design story, and the source of inspiration were investigated. In light of all this information, the findings obtained as a result of the architectural analysis of the selected contemporary icon structures and the analysis of their relationship with nature were evaluated, the future of these structures and their importance for the cities they belong to were discussed.

References

Broda, C. (2006). An examination of a series of small structures against the criteria for defining iconic architecture. City, 10(1), 101-106.

Ekenyazıcı, E. (2005). İkon yapıların turizm eğilimlerine etkileri, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul

Elhagla, K., Nassar, D. M., & Ragheb, M. A. (2020). Iconic buildings’ contribution toward urbanism. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 59(2), 803-813.

Erdoğan, E., & Sorguç, A. (2011). Hesaplamalı Modeller Aracılığıyla Mimari ve Doğal Biçim Tüketim İlkelerini İlişkilendirmek. ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(2), 269–281.

Hazaea, S. M. A. (2020). İkonik Mimarlık Kapsamında Konya’daki Modern Mimari Yapıların Kent Kimliğine Etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya.

İnceköse, Ü. (2008). Çağdaş Mimarlık Söylemleri ve Doğa bilimsel Bilgi: “Yeni” Mimarlık için “Yeni” den Bilimsel Kavramlar. Mimarlık Dergisi, 341(5-6), 32-34.

Jencks, C. (2006). The iconic building is here to stay. City, 10(1), 3-20.

Özen, G. (2016). Doğa Referanslı Tasarım: Biyomimikri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.

Yargıç, S. (2009). Küreselleşen Kentlerde İkonik Yapıların Kentsel Kimlik Oluşumuna Etkileri Üzerine İrdeleme. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Yıldız teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.

URL-1, Stuttgart Airport Terminal 1. Retrieved from https://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/T%E1%BA%ADp_tin:Stuttgart_Airport_Terminal_1.jpg, Erişim tarihi: 12.02.2023

URL-2, Lyon-Saint Exupery Airport Railway Station. Retrieved from https://www.arch2o.com/lyon-saint-exupery-airport-railway-station-santiago-calatrava/, Erişim tarihi: 14.02.2023

URL-3, Eden Project. Retrieved from https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eden_Projesi#/media/Dosya:Eden_Project_geodesic_domes_panorama.jpg, Erişim tarihi: 14.02.2023

URL-4, Pekin Ulusal Stadyumu. Retrieved from https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pekin_Ulusal_Stadyumu#/media/Dosya:Beijing_national_stadium.jpg, Erişim tarihi: 14.02.2023

URL-5, Metropol Parasol. Retrieved from https://www.bisantiye.com/ahsap-yapilar-metropol-parasol-ispanya/, Erişim tarihi: 17.02.2023

URL-6, Clyde Auditorium. Retrieved from https://www.flickr.com/photos/dalbera/3814217677, Erişim tarihi: 17.02.2023

URL-7, Royal Ontario Müzesi – Kristal. Retrieved from https://www.arkitektuel.com/royal-ontario-muzesi-kristal/, Erişim tarihi: 17.02.2023

URL-8, Harbin Opera Evi. Retrieved from https://www.arkitera.com/proje/harbin-opera-evi/, Erişim tarihi: 17.02.2023

URL-9, Lotus Temple Delhi. Retrieved from https://housing.com/news/insights-about-lotus-temple-height/, Erişim tarihi: 17.02.2023

URL-10, Hazza Bin Zayed Stadyumu. Retrieved from http://www.commtechist.com/tr_TR/ornek-projeler/hazza-bin-zayed-stadyumu/, Erişim tarihi: 17.02.2023

URL-11, Soumaya Müzesi. Retrieved from https://www.arkitera.com/proje/soumaya-muzesi/, Erişim tarihi: 17.02.2023

URL-12, The night view of Beijing National Aquatics Center. Retrieved from https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pekin_Ulusal_Su_Sporlar%C4%B1_Merkezi#/media/Dosya:%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%B6%E6%B8%B8%E6%B3%B3%E4%B8%AD%E5%BF%83%E5%A4%9C%E6%99%AF.jpg, Erişim tarihi: 17.02.2023

URL-13, Vanke Pavilion. Retrieved from https://www.archdaily.com/627994/vanke-pavilion-milan-expo-2015-daniel-libeskind, Erişim tarihi: 17.02.2023

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Kuyrukçu, Z. (2023). Investigation of Iconic Architecture-Nature Relationship. ICONTECH INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 7(2), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8130857

Issue

Section

Articles