Prediction of Labor Activity Recognition in Construction with Machine Learning Algorithms


  • Ibrahim Karatas Osmaniye Korkut Ata University
  • Abdulkadir BUDAK



Construction Management, Machine Learning, Activity Recognition, Labor


It is essential that the control and management of the work of labors in construction project management is effective. In this study, it is aimed to building artificial intelligence models to recognition on activities in a construction work to effectively utilization project management and control. In accordance with this purpose, 3-axis accelerometer, gyroscope, and magnetometer data were obtained from the labors through the sensor to predict the activities determined for a construction work. These raw data were made compliance for the model by going through a series of preprocessing applications. These data are trained and modeled with basic machine learning algorithms logistic regression, SVC, DT and KNN algorithms. According to the results of the analysis, the best prediction was obtained with the SVC algorithm with an accuracy of 90%. In other algorithms, respectively, 87% accuracy was contrived in the KNN algorithm, and approximately 80% accuracy in the logistic regression and DT algorithms. According to these values, it has been observed that the activities performed in a construction work can be estimated at a high rate. In this way, at the construction sites, it can be automatically determined which work the laborer do at a certain accuracy rate.


Akhavian, R., & Behzadan, A. H. (2016). Smartphone-based construction workers' activity recognition and classification. Automation in Construction, 71, 198–209.

Akinosho, T. D., Oyedele, L. O., Bilal, M., Ajayi, A. O., Delgado, M. D., Akinade, O. O., & Ahmed, A. A. (2020). Deep learning in the construction industry: A review of present status and future innovations. Journal of Building Engineering, 32, 101827.

Al Jassmi, H., Al Ahmad, M., & Ahmed Soha (2021). Automatic recognition of labor activity: A machine learning approach to capture activity physiological patterns using wearable sensors. Construction Innovation.

Alemayoh, T. T., Lee, J. H., & Okamoto, S. (2021). New sensor data structuring for deeper feature extraction in human activity recognition. Sensors, 21(8), 2814.

Antwi-Afari, M. F., Li, H., Seo, J., & Wong, A. Y. L. (Eds.) (2019). Automated Recognition of Construction Workers’ Activities for Productivity Measurement Using Wearable Insole Pressure System.

Babalola, A., Musa, S., Akinlolu, M. T., & Haupt, T. C. A bibliometric review of advances in building information modeling (bım) research. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology. -

Calvetti, D., Mêda, P., Chichorro Gonçalves, M., & Sousa, H. (2020). Worker 4.0: The future of sensored construction sites. Buildings, 10(10), 169.

Farooq, F., Ahmed, W., Akbar, A., Aslam, F., & Alyousef, R. (2021). Predictive modeling for sustainable high-performance concrete from industrial wastes: A comparison and optimization of models using ensemble learners. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292, 126032.

Garcia-Gonzalez, D., Rivero, D., Fernandez-Blanco, E., & Luaces, M. R. (2020). A public domain dataset for real-life human activity recognition using smartphone sensors. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 20(8).

Gondo, T., & Miura, R. (2020). Accelerometer-based activity recognition of workers at construction sites. Frontiers in Built Environment, 6, Article 563353.

Joshua, L., & Varghese, K. (Eds.) (2010). Construction Activity Classification Using Accelerometers. American Society of Civil Engineers.

Joshua, L., & Varghese, K. (2014). Automated recognition of construction labour activity using accelerometers in field situations. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(7), 841–862.

Kim, T.‑S., Cho, J.‑H., & Kim, J. T. (2013). Mobile motion sensor-based human activity recognition and energy expenditure estimation in building environments. Sustainability in Energy and Buildings, 987–993.

Kohavi, R. (Ed.) (1995). A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection.

Martín, H., Bernardos, A. M., Iglesias, J., & Casar, J. R. (2013). Activity logging using lightweight classification techniques in mobile devices. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17(4), 675–695.

Oke, A. E., Arowoiya, V. A., & Akomolafe, O. T. (2020). Influence of the ınternet of things’ application on construction project performance. International Journal of Construction Management, 1–11.

Ryu, J., Seo, J., Jebelli, H., & Lee, S. (2019). Automated action recognition using an accelerometer-embedded wristband-type activity tracker. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(1), 4018114.

Ryu, J., Seo, J., Liu, M., Lee, S., & Haas, C. T. (Eds.) (2016). Action Recognition Using a Wristband-Type Activity Tracker: Case Study of Masonry Work.

Sanhudo, L., Calvetti, D., Martins, J. P., Ramos, N. M., Mêda, P., Gonçalves, M. C., & Sousa, H. (2021). Activity classification using accelerometers and machine learning for complex construction worker activities. Journal of Building Engineering, 35, 102001.

Sherafat, B., Ahn, C. R., Akhavian, R., Behzadan, A. H., Golparvar-Fard, M., Kim, H., Lee, Y.‑C., Rashidi, A., & Azar, E. R. (2020). Automated methods for activity recognition of construction workers and equipment: State-of-the-art review. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(6), 3120002.

Sun, L., Zhang, D., Li, B., Guo, B., & Li, S. (Eds.) (2010). Activity Recognition on an Accelerometer Embedded Mobile Phone with Varying Positions and Orientations.

Xu, Y., Zhou, Y., Sekula, P., & Ding, L. (2021). Machine learning in construction: From shallow to deep learning. Developments in the Built Environment, 6, 100045.



How to Cite

Karatas, I., & BUDAK, A. (2021). Prediction of Labor Activity Recognition in Construction with Machine Learning Algorithms . ICONTECH INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 5(3), 38-47.