Feed Quality: Importance in Animal Production and Approaches to Evaluation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21452616

Keywords:

Feed Quality, Feed Evaluation, Nutritional Value, Feed Analysis

Abstract

Feed quality, while a fundamental concept in animal nutrition and livestock production, has been defined in various ways by different disciplines and researchers and is often considered a difficult concept to fully understand. Although it may seem simple at first glance, feed quality is a complex structure requiring the simultaneous evaluation of numerous factors, including the chemical composition of the feed, its nutrient content, digestibility, availability, hygienic status, effects on animal performance, and economic value. Therefore, evaluating feed quality solely based on specific analysis results or a single criterion is insufficient. To properly understand feed quality, all available data, analysis results, and practical applications must be considered from a holistic perspective. Although feed costs constitute a large portion of total production expenses in livestock farms today, feed quality is often not given the necessary consideration, or only the quantity of feed is prioritized. However, for highly efficient and sustainable livestock production, it is crucial not only to provide sufficient feed but also to use high-quality feed. High-quality feeds more effectively meet the nutritional needs of animals, increase feed utilization rates, support growth and development, improve milk and meat yields, enhance reproductive performance, and contribute to the protection of animal health. In addition, the use of high-quality feed offers significant advantages in terms of reducing feed losses and lowering production costs. Accurate determination and evaluation of feed quality enables the economical and efficient use of feed resources, while also forming the basis for the preparation of balanced and healthy rations. Especially in the face of the increasing world population and demand for animal products, the most efficient use of limited feed resources has become crucial. In this context, the development and more widespread application of methods used to determine feed quality by producers will contribute to both increased farm profitability and the creation of sustainable livestock systems. In conclusion, a comprehensive understanding of feed quality and its effective integration into production processes is considered one of the indispensable elements in achieving the productivity, economic sustainability, and product quality goals of modern livestock farming.

References

Acar, Z., Ayan, İ., Önal Aşcı, Ö., Mut, H., Başaran, U., Gülümser, E., Can, M., Kaymak Bayram, G., 2025. Yem Bitkileri Tarımında Mevcut Durum Ve Sürdürülebilirlik. Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisliği X. Teknik Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, Ankara, 1. Cilt, pp: 547-564.

Alçiçek, A., Karaayvaz, K., 2003. Sığır Besisinde Mısır Silajı Kullanımı. Animalia, 20 (3), s:18-76.

Alçiçek, A. Kılıç, A., Ayhan, V., Özdoğan, M., 2010. Türkiye’de Kaba Yem Üretimi ve Sorunları, Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisliği VII. Teknik Kongresi (2) s:1071-1080.

Ball, D.M., Hoveland, C.S., Lacefıeld, G.D., 1996. Forage Quality in Southern Forages. Potash&Phosphate Institute. Norcross, Georgia, 124-132s.

Ball,D.M., Collins, M., Lacefield, G.D., Martin, N.P., Mertens, D.A.,.Olson, K.E,. Putnam, D.H, Undersander, D.J., Wolf, M.W., 2001. Understanding Forage Quality. American Farm Bureau Federation Publication 1-01, Park Ridge, IL.

Basmacıoğlu, H., Ergül, M., 2003. Yemlerde Bulunan Toksinler ve Kontrol Yolları. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fak., Zootekni Bölümü, Yemler ve Hayvan Besleme Anabilim Dalı. Hayvansal Üretim 44(1): 9-17.

Boman R.L., 2003. New Forage Analysis: Increased Feed Efficiency Potential. USU Dairy Newsletter, 26, 3.

Budak, F. ve Budak, F., 2014. Yem Bitkilerinde Kalite ve Yem Bitkileri Kalitesini Etkileyen Faktörler. Türk Bilimsel Derlemeler Dergisi ISSN: 1308-0040, E-2146-0132, 7(1): 01-06.

Chase L.E., Grant R.J., 2013. High Forage Rations - What Do We Know?. Proceedings of the Cornell Nutrition Conference; Syracuse, New York, USA.

Doğan, E.S., Kırkpınar, F., 2025). Determination of Nutrient Composition and Potential Feed Value of Some Alternative Feed Sources. Journal of Animal Production, Vol: 66 (2): 178-190.

Ergül, M., 1988. Yemler Bilgisi ve Teknolojisi. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları II. Basım, Yayın No: 487, Bornova, İzmir.

Eskola, M., Kos, G., Elliott, C. T., Hajšlová, J., Mayar, S., & Krska, R., 2020. Worldwide Contamination Of Food-Crops With Mycotoxins: Validity Of The Widely Cited 'FAO estimate' of 25%. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 60(16), 2773–2789.

FAO, 2011. Animal Feed Impact on Food Safety. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

FAO, 2014. Fisheries and Aquaculture Information and Statistics Service, 50-62.

FAO ve IFIF, 2020. Good practices for the feed sector: Implementing the Codex Alimentarius Code of Practice on Good Animal Feeding (FAO Animal Production and Health Manual No. 24). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://ifif.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/IFIF-FAO-Feed-Manual 2020_CB1761EN_FINAL.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com (erişim tarihi:29.06.2026)

Güney, M., Bingöl, N.T., Aksu, T., 2016. Kaba Yem Kalitesinin Sınıflandırılmasında Kullanılan Göreceli Yem Değeri (GYD) ve Göreceli Kaba Yem Kalite İndeksi (GKKİ). Atatürk Üniversitesi Vet. Bil. Derg. 2016; 11(2): 254-258.

Gürsoy, E., Macit, M., 2020. Hasat Zamanının Kaba Yemin Kimyasal Kompozisyonu Ve Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi. Euroasia Journal of Mathematics, Engineering, Natural & Medical Sciences International Indexed & Refereed. ISSN:2667-6702. 7 (9).

IFIF, 2019. What Is The Global Feed Industry, International Feed Industry Federation Factsheet; International Feed Industry Federation (IFIF), Wiehl, Germany,https://ifif.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/IFIF-Fact- Sheet- October-11th-2019.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 05.06.2026).

İpçak, H. H., Özüretmen, S., Alçiçek, A., & Özelçam, H., (2018). Alternatif Protein Kaynaklarının Hayvan Beslemede Kullanım Olanakları. Journal of Animal Production, 59(1), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.29185/hayuretim.343285

Kaiser, A.G., Piltz, J.W., Burns, H.M., Griffiths, N.W., 2004. Successful Silage. The State of South Wales. Department of Primary Industries and Dairy Australia.

Karataş, Ö.F., 2024. Ruminant Hayvan Beslemede Kullanılan Kaba Ve Yoğun Yem Kaynaklarının Kalite Özellikleri Ve Yem Değerlerinin Tespitinde Kullanılan Temel Parametreler. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Zootekni Bölümü. Lisans Tezi.

Kaya, Ş., 2008. Kaba Yemlerin Değerlendirilmesinde Göreceli Yem Değeri ve Göreceli Kaba Yem Kalite İndeksi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Zootekni Bölümü Türk Bilimsel Derlemeler Dergisi 1 (1): 59-64.

Lin, B., Wang JH., Lu Y., Liang Q., Liu JX. 2013. In Vitro Rumen Fermentation And Methane Production Are İnfluenced By Active Components Of Essential Oils Combined With Fumarate. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 97(1): 1-9.

Moore, J.E., Undersander, D.J., 2002. Relative Forage Quality: An alternative to relative feed value and quality index. In “Proceedings of the 13th Annual Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium”, 10-11 January, Gainesville.

Newman Y.C., Lambert, B., Muir, J.P., 2006. Defining Forage Quality. The Texas A&M University System, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the County Commissioners Courts of Texas Cooperating: Texas, SCS-09, p:1-13.

Oğuz, H., Kurtoğlu, V. 2000. Effect of clinoptilolite on fattening performance of broiler chickens during experimental aflatoxicosis. British Poultry Science, 41:512-517.

Rivera, D., Parish, J., 2010. Interpreting Forage and Feed Analysis Report. 2620, Mississippi State University. Furtherance of Acts of Congress, May 8 and June 30, 1914.

Stone, J. B., Trimberger, G.W., Henderson, C.R., Reid, J.T., Turk K.L., Loosli, J.K., 1960. Forage intake and efficiency of feed utilization indairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 43:1275.

Şanlı, Y., 2001. Yem Küflenmeleri, Mikotoksinlerle Bulaşma Sorunu ve Çözüm Yolları. Çiftlik Hayvanlarının Beslenmesinde Temel Prensipler ve Karma Yem Üretiminde Bazı Bilimsel Yaklaşımlar. Editör: H. Melih Yavuz, ISBN NO:975/97831/0-X.

Trotter D.J., Johnson K.D., 1992. Forage-testing: Why, How, and Where, Purdue Univercity Cooperative Extension Service, 337.

Tuncer, Ş.D., 2012. Kaba Yemlerin Hayvan Beslemede Önemi. Hayvancılık Akademisi, 17 Aralık, Bursa.

Umur, H., Altınçekiç, E., Hanoğlu Oral H., Kütükoğlu, F., Manarga Birlik, P., 2022. Yemlerin Kalite Kontrolünde Mikroskopik Analiz Tekniğinin Kullanım Alanları. Gıda ve Yem Bilimi - Teknolojisi Dergisi / Journal of Food and Feed Science - Technology 27: 1-12.

Uslu, Ö.S., Kaya, M., 2020. Silaj: Hayvancılık İşletmelerinin En Önemli Kaba Yem Kaynağı. Editör U. Sevilmiş. Tarım ve Hayvancılıkta Yapılan Çalışmalar ve Güncel Değişimler. İksad Yayınevi (1) 5-43.

Van Soest, P.J., 1994. Fiber and Physicochemical Properties of Feed in: Nutritional Ecology of The Ruminant . Second Edition. Cornell University Press. 140-155.

Vurarak, Y., Avcı, M., Akkaya, M.R.,2020. Kaba Yem Kalitelerinin Belirlenmesinde Yaygın Olarak Kullanılan Bazı Yöntemlerin Karşılaştırılması. Gıda ve Yem Bilimi - Teknolojisi Dergisi / Journal of Food and Feed Science - Technology 23: 30-38 (2020/1).

Anonymous (2012). Pastured Heifers Grow Well and Have Productive First Lactations. Center for Integrated Agricultural Systems (CIAS), University of Wisconsin–Madison, Research Brief No. 89. Wisconsin, USA.

Published

2026-03-15

How to Cite

KAYA, M., & USLU, Ömer S. (2026). Feed Quality: Importance in Animal Production and Approaches to Evaluation. ICONTECH INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 8(5), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21452616